Life on Tap.

Home Beer You should be aging bad beer

You should be aging bad beer

An expert on vintage ales says beers that are terrible fresh are the ones that perform best in the cellar.
SHARE
, / 8

shutterstock_427286794

The next time you taste a beer that’s cloyingly sweet, motor-oil thick and and has as much alcohol burn as a shot of vodka, here’s what you should do: Go out and buy another one.

At least, that’s what Patrick Dawson says you should do. He should know—as the author of “Vintage Beer: A Taster’s Guide to Brews That Improve,” Dawson quite literally wrote the book on beer cellaring. (He’s also written about drinking really old beer for us before.) And he suggests that, rather than the relatively clean and well-constructed brews that commonly make it inside beer geek closets, the ones we should be aging actually taste pretty awful when released.

“I’ve talked to a couple guys who have been able to drink Thomas Hardy’s fresh—apparently you used to be able to get it near the brewery before they even aged it—and they’re like, ‘That stuff tasted like rocket fuel.’ You couldn’t even choke it down,” Dawson says. “But, oh, that’s one of the best aging beers of all time.”

Dawson proposes that the best beers for your cellar are extremely thick in body, taste overly sweet and lean heavy in alcohol when fresh. To understand why, you first need to recognize what’s going on inside a bottle of beer as it ages. First, malt sweetness fades over time. This is because beer isn’t a liquid, but a bunch of stuff suspended in a liquid (otherwise known as a colloid) and the complex sugars floating around inside a fresh beer tend to drop out of that suspension when it’s aged. This tends to make the beer taste less sweet, and has the added effect of thinning out the body.

“For me, a big red flag if I’m going to age a strong beer is if it’s kind of thin already,” Dawson says. “I want almost a syrupy sweet, cough syrup thickness, because after it ages for five years, that body is maybe going to be cut in half, or at least drastically reduced, and I want there to be something left over at the end.”

Another of Dawson’s requirements: “heat,” or alcohol burn. If the beer isn’t hot enough, meaning it doesn’t have a large amount of tongue-numbing fusel alcohols, it won’t develop nearly as much complexity as it ages.

“Maybe I have a high-alcohol beer, like 10% ABV, but if it drinks really smooth, that’s actually a deterrent for me because fusel alcohols are building blocks for a lot of these different flavor compounds that appear, specifically dried fruit flavors. For those to come about, there need to be fusel alcohols,” he says.

So a dream barleywine, stout or Belgian ale bound for the cellar, Dawson says, is “basically screaming hot—like, it just tastes like rubbing alcohol—and is syrupy sweet.”
“Over time, that’s going to develop so much more complexity and have enough body that by the time I drink it, it doesn’t feel like a Diet Coke,” he says.

You heard the man. Get out there and buy some shitty beer.

 

Author
Zach Fowle is DRAFT's beer editor. Reach him at zach@draftmag.com.

Related Articles

8 Comments

  • Replace the word “bad” with “unbalanced” and then I agree in full. That’s the key for me, most balanced big beers won’t really improve with age unless you are shooting for certain sherry and leather oxidization notes, some beers need time. despite what people say regarding the brewer’s intent. I do wish we’d see more Enjoy After dates on things.

  • Mr. Dawson is not suggesting you cellar shitty beer. I realize that this characterization may be made in humor but others may not get the joke. Well made strong, sweet beers will surely improve in flavor over time if properly cellared. Shitty young beer will over time evolve into shitty old beer.

  • There is no joke to get, the title is meant to be attention- grabbing even if it hardly matches the text, which is about a very specific category of beers that taste too dense and boozy when fresh but have a great potential to improve as they mellow. These are not exactly “bad”, bad is a lot of thing in a different categories: poorly made craft brews, bland and thin mass beers, etc.

  • Deeznutz says:

    This is a satire article .. right? Was this article intended for the onion. As an avid brewer .. this article is bs. If a beer taste like rocket fuel it’ll continue tasting like rocket fuel. It may mellow out a tiny bit over time .. but will still be sh*t. Additionally the comment about being syrupy is ridiculous. Again won’t get rid of the syrup aka high final gravity .. unless it’s aged on yeast and/or bacteria.

  • Ricky Potts says:

    Thanks for sharing. I pretty much stopped aging beer. Also, I will never age a beer that I haven’t tried fresh. Since I am on a mission to trying 10,000 unique beers, I rarely buy the same beer twice. But after reading this, the next bad beer I buy I will consider it… You know, for science! Cheers.

  • Sage says:

    “[…] the complex sugars floating around inside a fresh beer tend to drop out of that suspension when it’s aged”

    Huh? There aren’t any sugars large enough to fall out of a water/alcohol suspension unless you were to hypersaturate it. If a beer tastes less sweet after aging, it’s likely because it’s bottle-conditioned and the yeast have continued eating the sugars.

  • Josh Parks says:

    I know I’ve brewed some beers that weren’t great (and by not great I mean terrible) but didn’t have the heart to dump them out. And over time they have gotten better. (And by better I mean not as terrible) so maybe he does mean shitty beer. I know there have been occasions where bottle aging has helped my beer.

  • Beavis says:

    Would aged Cooks develop into the definitive American goose?

Leave A Reply to Alexander Suraev Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.